It’s becoming an unlikely chorus: David Lowery, the RIAA, and many artists themselves now feel that the digital age has made itworse for musicians, not better.  But former TuneCore CEO Jeff Price couldn’t disagree more — and in this guest post, he brings a litany of stats to prove his point.

“During his speech on June 12th, 2012 at the Personal Democracy conference in New York City, Cary Sherman, head of the RIAA, stated:

‘…there are fewer people trying to make money as musicians today…’

Cary misrepresented the truth to push the RIAA’s agenda.

As the former CEO and Founder of TuneCore, I can tell you that between just CD Baby and TuneCore there were at least 20,000-30,000 newly recorded releases distributed each month. Each major label currently signs/distributes/releases about 110 releases a year. That’s about 9 a month.

In its heyday in 1998, Warner was releasing about 365 releases a year, one a day.

Read the rest after the jump! [DigitalMusicNews]

 

This means there is more new music being recorded and distributed in just one month than all of the majors combined release in over 100 years.

Now add the fact that barriers to becoming a musician are lower due to technology – it costs less to record and you don’t need the same type of talent in order to create/write/record music (its easier now).

Therefore, there are more musicians, not fewer.

In addition, a recent article at Digital Music News suggests that:

“There’s more music being created than ever before, but paradoxically, musicians are making less. Which means there are also fewer musicians and music professionals enjoying gainful employment, thanks to a deflated ecosystem once primed by major labels and marked-up CDs.”

I disagree.  Look at the numbers.

In the old system, at its peak, all of the majors combined distributed a total of about 1,800 releases a year.

Of those 1,800 releases, about 20% were box-sets, re-issues etc.  This leaves about 1,500 new releases.  Of those, some were not debut releases by ‘new’ artists.  This leaves about 1,200 releases a year of ‘new’ artists coming into the music ecosystem.

Of those 1,200 releases by new artists, 98% of them (1,176) failed and were dropped.  This leaves 24 artists a year that ‘succeed’.

There are a lot more than 24 artists a year these days that ‘succeed’.

Now granted, of these 24 artists, they raked it in, big time.  But that was just for them.

In the ‘old days,’ musicians did not really make any money. There were the lucky and talented few that did – i.e. U2, Led Zeppelin etc – but these musicians were the rare rare rare exception, not the rule.  The rules were:

(a) Less than 1% of the world’s artists will be let into the music industry ecosystem.

(b) Of those let in, 98% of artists will fail and get dropped after the release of their first album.

(c) Of the 2% that succeed, less than half of them will ever get paid a band royalty for the sale of their pre-recorded music on CD/vinyl, as they are “un-recouped” (The band royalty rate for the sale of a $17.98 list price CD in Walmart etc was $1.35 – $1.75 for each unit sold).

(d) If you wrote your songs, to get all of your songwriter royalties, you had to do deals with major publishing companies—and most could not get one. If you were able to get one, you usually signed a co-pub deal where, for a one-time advance, you had to give up 50% of your income and 50% ownership of copyrights to get all the royalties you earned.  And mind you, this was just for the band members that wrote the songs, not all band members.

(e) You lost money when you toured (and you had to tour).

(f) The cost of failure was that your career was over and done.

And the list keeps on going.

The hard truth is, forget making less money, most artists made no money in the traditional industry; they could not even get into the ecosystem to have their music available to be bought on the shelves of stores.

As a matter of fact, they lost more money in the old industry, as the costs to record were higher and the goal used to be to get signed.  Getting signed meant: buying gear; spending money to record a demo; manufacturing a physical CD or cassette to mail to an A&R rep to get a gig in LA or NY so the label rep could see you, fronting costs to play the gig, etc.

In other words, invest more, make less and don’t get let in.

Let me be clear, no matter what the music industry business model is, most artists will not succeed.  This is a tough business.  The path to success is writing and recording a song that causes reaction when it is listened to – a rare and difficult thing.

But for Cary Sherman to stand up and state something false so the RIAA can attempt to slow down its demise is beyond disgusting and does damage to artists, perhaps almost as much as the file sharing he is raging against.

Follow Jeff Price on his blog, or @TuneCoreJeff.

Live Nation chairman Irving Azoff to the list of people who think it’s harder, not easier, for artists to make it in the music business these days. And according to Azoff, part of the problem is that it’s easier to make music than ever before, with less monetization, a stark contrast to the ‘golden age’ of the 60s and 70s. ”Basically then versus now, you’d have one hit record and you could come to Los Angeles and sell out three days at the Staples Center – then it was the Forum, but now it would be Staples Center,” Azoff recently told interviewer Jude Apatow at the ‘Grill’. ”Now, one you can’t get a hit but if you do get a hit, you get to open up for somebody at a club.”

“I regularly tell people that it’s way different, way more difficult now.”

And instead of getting signed, the new lottery card is… the Voice? ”In those days, no one would consider going on a competition music show,” Azoff relayed. ”Now you watch the Voice and hear all these kids say, ‘this is the greatest opportunity of my life,’ and yet, you’ve got 64 contestants on the Voice. We’ve had 10-11 years of American Idol, so you’ve had 100 or 110 top ten people, andyou can count on your hand the number of careers that have sustained off of that.”

“So that just tells you that even with the massive exposure of network TV, how hard it is to make it in the music business.”

But what are the culprits? ”Theft and choice, and also, it used to be very expensive to record a record, now you can do it at home,” Azoff said. ”Music is now the soundtrack of people’s lives, but it has way less monetization.” [DigitalMusicNews]

Who’s It For?

Somebody who’s looking for a better-than-average Bluetooth speaker and has money to burn.

 Design

The Pill is a speaker tube with a see-through metal grill that shows off the its four drivers. A big iconic “B” lights up red smack in the center. It fits in your hand like a bulky Red Bull can, and weighs significantly less than a pound.

Using It

The pill connects via Bluetooth just like every other Bluetooth device does. NFC Bluetooth pairing only works on NFC-equipped

BEATS PILL
• PRICE: $200
• DRIVERS: 4, 1-INCH DRIVERS
• CONNECTIVITY: BLUETOOTH 2.1, NFC,
• WEIGHT: 10.5 OUNCES
• GIZRANK: 3.5


Stephen Hill is Executive Vice President of Entertainment and Music Programming for BET (Black Entertainment Television). In 2004, he was named number one on The Source magazine’s 2004 “List of Most Influential Executives” in the music industry. His responsibilities at BET include managing, directing, developing and producing music programming for the network.

Paul McCartney was presented with the 1,298,398 honor of his career when BMI gave him its Million-Air Award, representing more than 4 million U.S. broadcast performances of his James Bond film song, “Live and Let Die,” before the org’s 2012 London awards ceremony. Others who have received the accolade include Dolly PartonIsaac Hayes and Roy Orbison. Sir Paul McCartney has received a total of 75 BMI Million-Air Awards throughout his career, including one for achieving 5 millionU.S. plays for The Beatles’ “Yesterday” in 1988, which now surpasses 9 million. BMI Executive Director, Writer/Publisher Relations Brandon Bakshi presents Macca with the award before joining him in two-part harmonies on a “Hey Jude.”

 


This tutorial is the first in a two part mini series exploring the capability in Logic Pro of being able to design your own custom controller, in this case, for controlling an LFO filter cut-off wobble bass. You will learn how to read the signals sent from plug-ins, and build and adapt faders utilising the power of transformers in the environment window to create an MPC style pad interface for the ES2 which controls the wobble increments of the LFO. In this part we take a look into setting up the ES2 synthesizer so that it will act in the way we require for it to be controlled by our own custom built controller.

According to Nielsen, the first 9 months of 2012, digital album sales in the U.S. are up 15% over the same period last year. American fans have already purchased 1 billion digital tracks, a pace that should break 2011’s record of 1.3 billion sold.

A look at music sales over the past few years show that an explosion of new devices including smartphones and tablets has played a major factor in the growth of digital music.

“As we look ahead, it’s clear that digital music purchases – and consumption through streaming sources -will continue to grow, and that consumers’ appetites for digital music will change at the speed of technology,” said David Bakula, SVP of Client Development at Nielsen. “These trends will no doubt continue to shape the way that music is discovered, marketed, consumed and sold.” [Allindstrom]

Shakim Compere, co-owner of Flavor Unit Entertainment, talks about the founding of the company. He explains that he and Queen Latifah started the company. Compere discusses how Flavor Unit Entertainment attempts to take hip-hop talent and have it exceed the boundaries of music. While the company still manages artists such as Big Boi and Terrence Howard, they are also involved in the film and television industries. For instance, Compere lists Beauty Shop, Bringing Down the House, and the Vibe Awards as other works they’ve produced. Also in this segment, Compere covers the importance of packaging. Packaging allows for more than one income stream. Due to music videos, artists easily catch the acting bug. Compere also offers advice. He emphasizes the significance of being persistent and having a game plan.

I often get asked: what’s the best social media site for bands? My business clients ask the same thing using different words: what is the best marketing channel to promote my brand? The idea that there is a magic formula or single solution to take care of all your needs is a misnomer. Where you should be promoting and the tools that you should be using should revolve around one main concept: where your target audience is. It’s as simple as that.

We often make things more complicated by adding in our own hurdles to success. We ask, what about fans who use multiple sites? What about our own website/mailing list? What about getting new fans? Those answers all are solved when you really understand who your target audience is. This is why I always say that buying followers is a bad idea…because not only are you buying spam/fake accounts, it does nothing for your real target audience.

Here are some helpful hints to help determine where you should stake your brand:

  • Your target audience is already there: If your fans/potential fans are on Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Mixi, Pinterest, etc. chances are that you should too. It’s an easy way for people to share about you and for content to become viral. However, it’s important to understand the nature of each of these sites..just because people are on the sites doesn’t mean that they’ll care about what you do on them. Whatever you do, it should resonate with the target audience there. I write about that here: How to Develop a Hardcore Fan Base.
  • When you have more than one audience: The same principles apply above if you have more than one target audience. For example, promoters are more likely to check out your ReverbNation than a casual fan.
  • Can you do it well?: If you don’t have time/the ability to create something of quality, perhaps you should wait until you can (or at least grow the skills before pushing the site). You don’t want to fragment your brand by creating several poorly managed, out of date websites. These do reflect on your band. Instead, focus on what you can do well and have time to keep fresh, relevant, and looking good.
  • Bring it all home: Whatever you decide to do with social media, make sure you loop those fans back into your own website/email list. Social media sites come and go but people should always be able to rely on your website and mailing list to get reliable content when they stop using social media sites. Don’t wait until Facebook becomes the next Myspace before you jump ship. Make your brand-controlled sites the ultimate destination for fan related content.

Remember, you shouldn’t have a Facebook or BandCamp page just because other people have one. You should have those pages if that’s where your fans (current and prospective) are hanging out at. What sites do you use? Any unusual success with lesser known ones? [MusicThinkTank]

People I talk to seem to be split between two opinions: the majors are doing OK; and the majors are doomed. If people come from the world of independent music they tend to be biased against the major labels or downright distrustful of them. If they have some experience with major labels they tend to recognize the degree to which the majors have changed and have greater faith (or hope) they will carry on.

Lately I’ve had some interesting conversations with people who think the label model is proving its sustainability. I agree. Not all labels will survive — witness last week’s news that respected metal label Hydra Head will cease putting out new releases. But labels have worked hard to develop new business models and are proving that a varied mix of revenue streams can sustain a business.

If you think labels are more doomed than saved, here are the numbers for your own interpretation: In the first six months of 2012, Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony’s music companies had operating profits of $356 million on $6.26 billion of revenues. Given the seasonality of the business, these three majors should have over 1 billion dollars operating profit in 2012. (Due to release schedules, the first six months of the year are the lightest in terms of profit and the last six are the heaviest.)

I think you’d have to be living in a bubble to say the traditional music business – in the midst, and possibly at the bottom, of a painful transition – is doomed with well over $1 billion in annual operating profits. That figure doesn’t take into account amortization (which take into account the value of the intangible, fixed-life assets at the very heart of the business). Nor does it take into account depreciation, and some other one-time expenses such as fees related to mergers. But it’s still a billion dollars. I’d say that’s evidence the record label model can succeed in its current form for many more years.

The other majors in recorded music and publishing only add to that billion-dollar figure. EMI does not report its financial results. Bertelsmann does not break out the performance of BMG Rights Management on a quarterly basis, but CEO Thomas Rabe told Billboard.biz last month that BMG revenues would reach 250 million euros this year.

Those are somewhat encouraging numbers given the trauma the music industry has gone through, yet it’s always been easier to find a naysayer than a believer in large, corporate music companies. Jeff Price,co-founder and former CEO of digital distributor TuneCore, wrote last week in a blog post ”[t]he old system is in ruins, degrading a bit more each day.”

But the old system is not in ruins. Not yet. And with Universal Music Group closing in on its acquisition of EMI Music’s recorded music division — most likely with some concessions to lower market share — the “old boy’s club,” so to speak, is about to get a little bit stronger.

The idea that the record industry lays “in ruins” runs throughout the public’s consciousness. While watching the movie “The Social Network” recently — and not for the first time — I noticed an interesting exchange between the characters Sean Parker (played by Justin Timberlake) and Eduardo Saverin. Screenwriter Aaron Sorkin had Parker equate the demise of Tower Records with Napster’s victory over the record industry. But Sorkin missed the point: Tower Records was merely a supplier. Tower went bankrupt, but the labels are still in business.

The old way of doing business — the old value chain — is gone. Music companies owned the plants that manufactured CDs and LPs. They owned the distributors. They had representatives and promotional people spread across the country. It was a business built for physical product, newspaperadvertising and mom-and-pop retail.

The new value chain is different. It encourages efficiency and a keen eye toward technology. Ownership of multiple pieces of the value chain is gone — distributors and manufacturers have been sold. Artist contracts are different (for better or worse). Staffs are smaller and many tasks are outsources.

The reason why EMI Music and Warner Music Group had so many bidders? There’s still great value in music companies.

Read more at http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/industry/record-labels/business-matters-reports-of-the-death-of-1007951122.story#IEDsJJd34IIBkUTD.99